"Do we actually need biology in this technological age?" – John Humphreys on the Today Programme this morning.
My opinion of journalists is not high as you can tell from other posts here, but can Mr Humphreys really be that stupid – or is he just being deliberately controversial?
Perhaps because he only 'did' frogs, amoebæ and rabbits' naughty bits at school some time last century, he imagines biology is a cissy science that isn't fit for the world today. I suspect he is not alone in that – but where do these people think that modern advances in gene therapy and medicine comes from, for instance? Media studies?

25/05/07 @ 11:46