Search blog.co.uk

Science - who cares?

by loiswakeman @ 05/02/2007 - 18:43:15

A recent post in Life's Lessons' blog [edit: now defunct] brought up a topic I had thought about twice this past week. For some reason, it is often acceptable (in the media and generally) to be a scientific ignoramus, in a way that is not true for other subjects.

As I graduated with a science degree, I naturally find that a bit annoying!

Last week, there was a short article about Linnaean classification (I can't remember where, but probably Radio 4), and the female presenter was stumbling hopelessly over the Latin names of several commonly known species (at least to me having done Biology A level many years ago) - like Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster. She didn't seem in the least embarrassed, as might have been the case if it was some obscure foreign diplomat's name for example.

And today, I listened to the Food Programme also on R4, which is all about rapeseed oil. Sheila Dillon visited Duncan Farrington - a rapeseed farmer, and during their discussion, mentioned that the seedpods were shaped like chillies. Duncan replied that since rape belonged to the same family (Solanaceae) as chillies, this wasn't surprising. Well Duncan, rape is, and always has been AFAIK, in a different family (Brassicaceae). You might think that even if he didn't know, there might be some fact-checker to do a little bit of work behind the scenes? Or not.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

deleted user [Visitor]

05/02/07 @ 19:36

Strange isn't it - you would think they would check the pronounciations as they do with names and countries.

I don't want to go back to the posh BBC of the 'Brains Trust' era but why do they use ignorant reporters who say they pretend to represent the 'common man' but in fact dumb us all down with their ignorance and sheer lack of knowledge. The only programme I can think of that deals with science on an adult level is Melvin Bragg but unfortunately it can be dull at times. Whatever happened to the programmes like Cosmos that actually tried to educate people.

Good post.

loiswakemanloiswakeman [Member]
http://lois.co.uk
06/02/07 @ 10:16

The Material World isn't bad - but I always miss part of it as I'm out that evening. Radio science is a bit better than TV science (apart from the marvellous spoof, Look Around You - which reduces me to tears of helpless laughter when I watch it on DVD).

deleted user [Visitor]

06/02/07 @ 10:35

I'd forgotten that programme as I don't often get a chance to listen to it. I must see if it is on Listen Again or as a Podcast. Dull ad grey here, not even a pigeon to be seen.

govindangovindan [Member]
07/02/07 @ 09:01

Ignorance is not something to be embarrased about these days.

loiswakemanloiswakeman [Member]
http://lois.co.uk
07/02/07 @ 09:49

Sadly, I think you are right. It embarrasses me though!

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).